Skip to main content

Arguments vs. Discourse response

Arguing is what makes everyone express that they have their own opinion on a subject. Sometimes arguments help bring out the attention to key facts that would have probably been over looked otherwise. It's another way of communication and doesn't signify a hatred for the person they are arguing with, just the clashing opinions of them; like animals who will fight over something and then get along.

If you have a dog, or another pet, there might be times where your pet would get angry at you, possibly become posessive or they might not want you anywhere near them, and after they're over that event, of whatever did happen, they'll let you close and might give you some kisses, telling you they're fine.

As stated, the ancient Greeks would argue about things all day for fun and then shake hands and go home. They argue, but they make up in the end, because opinions are what makes everyone unique and their own person.

In some arguments, the two parties will get so steamed at the refusal of the other party to accept their ideas that the two will go away, storming off. Sometimes it's just better to walk away, and once it's realized as pointless to continue, the two parties would not have come to any terms of acceptance of the other idea. That's why when people argue about things relating to politics and religion that they get mad at each other, because those two things are hard to see another side of things on. As well as the idea of what happens after death, where there's no solid proof to back up any statement.

Some people might think that rules should be made about how to argue and what to do in an argument. Wouldn't everyone start arguing about the rules then? I don't think we should have any rules in that case.

A few people might think it's a good idea to have rules because it would prevent anger from escalating during an argument. (Do you think anger or argument branched off from each other?)

In my opinion, anger isn't the cause of arguments, although some usually get angry during arguments. Clashing beliefs, ideas and a misunderstanding are causes of arguments, and the causes of war. The only way to stop these problems from escalating into wars would be figuring out how to understand other views and where your own flaws, and accepting it. As well, anyone that can't think with a level head should not be in control of a large force capable of possessing heavy artillery and invading another area.

I'm not capable of writing a lot on this subject because I'm a very complacent character and if I get in an argument, I usually have a good reason for it... I think. Actually, I don't recall getting in an argument... Complaining, yes, arguing, not so much...

I don't know what discourse is, and I was hoping to see it in the question, but sometimes you have to live with something you don't understand, which is another thing some people end up arguing about, the lack of information they were given.

Maybe the goal is conversation and not arguing, because conversation is with a little more open mind to new ideas instead of in a box and trying to preach at someone who doesn't care about what you're saying and has their own ideas already.

Comments

  1. First off: "I don't know what discourse is, and I was hoping to see it in the question." That's my mistake. Sorry about that. Discourse is a formal conversation, like a debate.

    Again, great job! You seem to have a talent for using a lot of great detail to support an argument.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Set a Table : a book review

How to Set a Table is a quaint little book that was published by POTTER STYLE, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, but oddly enough doesn't credit any author on any of the standard pages. Much digging into the fine print on the very last informative page tells us that Chloe Lieske wrote it - but trying to find this book using her name doesn't show up readily in search results, as though she was discredited and only there to write up a joint collective voice. The book itself is textured in such a way from the burlap style of the cover, that it turns itself into a nice piece to display around your house. How to Set a table is extremely visual and easy to read over - but putting everything mentioned into practice is significantly harder if you're not a specific kind of person. If you don't have nice dinnerware of either porcelain, earthenware or stoneware of varied sizes and shapes along with diff...

A Throwback from 2018: Daily Social Media Inspiration for Fitness Centers

 Back in 2018 I used to work at FitRewards. This was a rewards and loyalty program that marketed itself towards fitness centers, but could be used at other businesses as a corporate reward program, to incentivize their clients or staff to do specific behaviors for points. The closest competitor that is still around would be Perkville. At the time FitRewards stood out from their direct competitor by creating a measured point system against a dollar amount; and working with vendors to offer high-value reward items. Because of the mixed B2B focus on our internal marketing, but also the B2C traffic our channels would get due to the members that were in the program, our channels had to be playing both fields.  I thought it would be a nice share to drop the general "Daily Topics" that I had put together back in 2018 as they were broad enough then to be valuable now, and would be great in a B2C fitness center space to piggy back off of when they just need a little extra filler conte...

The Chamberlain Key - a Review

I'm a designer. I love things that are well designed. The cover of The Chamberlain Key was designed well enough to get me interested in picking it up. The cover itself has an image referred to as temple scroll and there's a lot of hebrew in the background on the front cover that looks decorative at first; it's little things like that which made it so inviting to pick up. Before starting to read, I felt like the cover would give me a sense of what it was all about. A quick flipping through the pages gauges that an editorial designer wasn't in use for the creation of this print job. Mainly indicated by hyphenations, single words or short amount of letters on one line. This isn't problematic, although a little distracting for my well-trained eyes. Additionally, having an editorial designer work with all the text and images would probably make the cost too high to get Smith's message out. I'm also not much for religious stories. Reading "The Chamb...